Cholesterol: The good, the bad, the ugly

The first thing I’m going to say about cholesterol is that we don’t understand it well enough. On my first day of medical school back in the early 1990’s, Dr. Kirby, our Dean of Students, said that half of what we were about to learn over the next four years would turn out to be false. The problem was that no one knew which half! Here are some of the things I learned in medical school that have turned out to be false:

1) LDL cholesterol is bad cholesterol.

2) There is no reliable way to increase your good cholesterol (HDL).

3) We don’t really know how triglycerides fit in, but they probably don’t matter anyway.

Let’s discuss these statements one at a time.

LDL comes in two major types, either 1) small and dense or 2) big and fluffy. Small, dense LDL is bad, but large, fluffy LDL is okay. Small, dense LDL is highly atherogenic, which is a medical term meaning that it causes plaque formation, heart disease, hardening of the arteries (also known as atherosclerosis). It’s like sand. It gets stuck everywhere, which the body responds to by laying down plaque all around it. It reminds me of the grain of sand that irritates an oyster, who responds by coating that sand particle with layers of nacre, the shiny, luminescent stuff that creates pearls. Humans don’t get pearls. We get heart attacks and strokes.

Then there are the big, fluffy LDL particles that float through the blood stream without attaching to the walls of the blood vessels. This subtype of LDL is much better. If you want to know what kind of LDL you have, you can ask your doctor to run a special type of panel instead of a standard lipid profile. This will show how much of your LDL is small and dense, and how much is large and fluffy. You want large, fluffy LDL. If your LDL comes back slightly high but not exceedingly so, say 135, for example, finding out whether it’s small or large might influence your doctor’s decision about whether to start you on cholesterol-lowering medication. But there are other ways to infer whether your LDL is dense or fluffy.

HDL cholesterol is sometimes referred to as “good” cholesterol. H for healthy. There is an inverse relationship between HDL and risk of heart attack: the lower your HDL, the greater your risk of developing hardening of the arteries. A number of important research studies have shown low HDL to be a much more serious risk factor than high LDL (the small, dense kind as you now know). There are a number of reliable ways to increase your HDL, and all of them have one thing in common: All of them improve your insulin sensitivity, to make it work more efficiently, conserve your insulin supply, protect your insulin-production machinery. When I see very low HDL levels in patients, I can usually guess that they are eating large amounts of fast food, processed food, and/or stripped (refined) carbohydrates, along with little or no fruits, vegetables or legumes.

How do you raise your HDL? By improving the nutritional value of the foods you are choosing, by reducing the amount of fast and highly processed food you eat, and by getting more exercise. All of these strategies improve your insulin sensitivity. Skip the doughnuts, and eat foods that are rich in B vitamins, found in abundance in whole grains, fruits, vegetables, beans, and nutritional yeast.

What about triglycerides? If HDL is good cholesterol, and small, dense LDL is bad cholesterol, then triglycerides are ugly cholesterol. The goal, from a medical standpoint, is to keep triglycerides below 150, but the truth is that the lower, the better. Triglyceride molecules, which happen to be shaped like the capital letter “E,” are the chemical compound form in which we store fat. They consist of a single vertical sugar backbone (the glycerol) with three horizontal tails (the fatty acids). The more stripped carb you eat, the more glycerol molecules you make. The more glycerol molecules you make, the more triglyceride you can create. You cannot make triglyceride without glycerol, and glycerol comes straight from the sugar and starch that you eat.

Remember that the more stripped carb (white flour, corn starch, corn syrup, sugar) you eat, the more insulin you need to make. The more insulin that floats around in your blood stream, the more triglycerides you make. So high triglycerides are associated with the hyperinsulinemic (high insulin) state, and the higher your insulin levels, the higher your triglycerides. Generally, I see high triglycerides in folks whose diets contain large amounts of 1) stripped carbs, 2) fast food, and/or 3) alcohol. I can also predict, with a fair degree of reliability, whether a patient has an elevated triglyceride level with a quick glance at their waistline. Hyperinsulinemia causes fat deposition under the chin and in the abdomen — no surprise there; that’s where the gastrointestinal tract is — so that’s where the action is happening. Another name for this condition is a “beer belly.” Drinking beer is like eating grain without the fiber. That means it’s stripped carb. Drinking excessive amounts of beer can be a serious problem, and a great many people noticed this connection long before me.

Now, low HDL is bad, and high triglycerides are ugly, but the combination of low HDL and high triglycerides is downright scary. This combination is highly associated with high insulin levels and hardening of the arteries. Any time I see a patient with the combination of low HDL and high triglycerides, I know they are at high risk of becoming diabetic, that is, if they haven’t got it already. When I explain the data, I let them know I do not intend to wait around for them to develop the symptoms of diabetes; I already know how high their risk is. They deserve to know about it now, and they deserve to be able to fix it before it becomes a much bigger problem. And, yes, it is fixable.

I also know that a lipid panel showing a “low HDL/high triglyceride” pattern is strongly associated with the small, dense LDL subtype. This is not coincidental, but rather a predictable consequence of eating stripped, refined, processed and fast “food.” And that means it is not so hard to fix. Notice that I do not look at each measurement in the lipid profile as an individual entity, but rather at the overall pattern. And I also am not looking at the numbers as ends in themselves; I am much more interested in the person who is carrying those numbers.

This is a complex topic, and it raises at least as many questions as it answers. So please feel free to post your questions, and give me an opportunity to try to answer them. Do not worry that your questions are simple. I guarantee you that many people are wondering the same thing. I may even have attended medical school with some of them.

8 thoughts on “Cholesterol: The good, the bad, the ugly


    • It’s a good question, and I have nothing to draw on for my answer except my sense of how things work. Certainly, the alcohol in all of them will have an equivalent effect, because alcohol exerts its effect independent of the vehicle in which it arrives. However, we do not talk about a whiskey belly or a wine belly, although I have seen some of the latter. What we really have noticed is the beer belly, and that says something in and of itself.

      Perhaps the grain in beer influences metabolism additionally and additively, so that those who drink it in excess (more than 12 oz. daily for females or 24 oz. for males) are affected by both the grain and the alcohol. Alcohol raises triglycerides without lowering HDL, so you can see from the lipid profile who may be drinking too much alcohol as distinct from who may be eating too much processed food. I have not seen enough lipid profiles from major beer drinkers to be able to say whether the effect looks different.

      Thanks for your question– RBS



    • In my department we generally use the LDL level to decide whether to lower cholesterol through medication in individuals with a high lipoprotein (a), generally defined as higher than approx 40, though some cardiologists say 30. An LDL over 100-130 would probably trigger a recommendation to start cholesterol-lowering medication, though it would depend on the patient’s other risk factors, including age and gender. One other way I might use lp(a) is to decide whether to treat in an individual with a good looking lipid profile but a very strong family history of premature coronary artery disease. If that person’s lp(a) is over 100, I would probably lean toward recommending medication. Thanks for the question — RBS


  1. Thank you for this excellent post. I knew about the LDL vs HDL cholesterol, but never understood what triglycerides are or even heard about the different types of LDL. It also explains why I had a hard time losing weight, despite a high-fiber/minimal processed food diet and regular exercise, until I cut back on my wine intake.

    I have a couple questions:
    1) Does fluffy LDL have a similar effect on the body as HDL?
    2) What are fluffy LDL sources?

    Thank you,
    TK


    • I do not believe that the fluffy LDL has a beneficial effect per se, but rather that it reflects beneficial lifestyle choices as opposed to less constructive ones. I think the HDL also works that way.

      Re: fluffy LDL sources, it’s not that we are eating foods that provide these, but rather that when the body metabolism works in a way that supports good health, the kind of LDL that gets manufactured by that “healthy body factory” is the large, fluffy type.

      Thank you! RBS


  2. Because women often have higher levels of good cholesterol, their cholesterol ratio risk categories differ. According to the same study, a 4.4 ratio indicates average risk for heart disease in women. Heart disease risk for women doubles if their ratio is 7, while a ratio of 3.3 signifies roughly half the average risk.Jul 27, 2017 http://www.healthline.com

    Do you agree that there is a difference between men & women’s levels as indicated above? My ratio is 3.0 so my doctor wants me to exercise more (I do yoga 2-3 per week & walk laps on the ground floor of my apartment plus up & down the stairs to the 3rd floor) and eat less fat (I eat avocado 3-4 times a week and butter on my baked potato 1 per week, 2-6 oz animal protein 1-2 per week. And 80% dark chocolate). I am female in my 60’s.


    • Risk assessments for cardiovascular disease are multifactorial, and depend on smoking history, waist:hip ratio, family history, personal medical history and other factors. I trust that your doctor’s recommendations are taking into account all these factors. Continue to do the best you can. Remember that there is a difference between vegetable-based and animal-based fat sources. I see no need to limit avocados, olive oil, dark chocolate, nuts and seeds over concerns about cholesterol or heart disease. Best wishes for your good health, RBS


Leave a Reply to TK Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.